So with the dreaded lull of sports we're in, we've decided to bring more of the bullshit aspect up of the blog as we scrap for ideas much like a stoner scrapes resin off of a bowl to get by (and it always did the trick for me, except when the ball hit your tongue, that sucked...literally!)
With that in mind, I unveil Would You Rather? The age old question between two things generally negative in a quest for the lesser of two evils. So do us a favor and play along. Cause there's not shit else to do, and I don't feel like fucking around with YouTube today.
With that in mind, I unveil Would You Rather? The age old question between two things generally negative in a quest for the lesser of two evils. So do us a favor and play along. Cause there's not shit else to do, and I don't feel like fucking around with YouTube today.
TODAY'S QUESTION: WOULD YOU RATHER DROWN OR BURN TO DEATH?
OR
Let's think this one out here. Drowning is a combination of complete agony and suffocation. Thrashing violently and not breathing. I'm not too sure how long you can breathe if you're on fire, but I would think you've got at least a little bit, so I give fire the notch on that one.
However, being in water is more comfortable then being engulfed in flames, so drowning gets the nod there. It's a tough one, and I've always been more partial to the fire, but I'm going with drowning on this one for the mere fact I don't want to feel my flesh peeling off or my fucking eyes melting. Bad times indeed.
Complete sidenote; why do kids always put their heads in fucking plastic bags? I mean I've done it when I was younger too. What the fuck is so facinating about not breathing? Let the comments begin...
