Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Why Are We Not Looking At Larry Brown?

I merely pose this as a question at this point. I'm not saying I'm convinced Larry Brown is the guy for the job, or that Jim Boylan isn't. As the Chicago Tribune's K.C. Johnson points out, after tonight's game, Boylan will have coached the same amount of games as Scott Skiles has. Skiles got the axe after a 9-16 start, and Boylan has gone 11-13 to this point. Under Boylan, the Bulls are averaging 7 more points per game (No thanks to professional crybaby fuckstick Wallace) and are back in the top 10 for opponent field goal percentage. Considering they've been without Luol Deng, Ben Gordon and Kirk Hinrich for a significant period of time, I think that record is pretty damn good. But all I'm asking you my fellow Bulls fans, is why not Larry Brown? Now, I'll answer the obvious questions as to why you wouldn't want him, and then I'll give you my arguments for why you should. I'll allow you to be the judge.


The key word is slowly here. Yes, they're looking better, both on paper and in games. But they still can't finish anybody, and I'm not sure that just anyone can instill that into a team. It's also hard to remove someone who has had the players backing thus far, as Luol Deng wrote in his blog last month::

Jim has been real positive. Even in games when we have stretches of not playing so well, he stays positive and believes in us that we’re going to compete out there and do better. For this team, that’s been the biggest factor right now. Also, the style that he’s bringing in has helped. We’re playing more uptempo, we’re pushing the ball, on timeouts we’re running a lot of different sets just by Jim reading the mismatches out there on the court, and players have been doing a good job of tuning in.

It's seems as though the players like Boylan for not riding their asses all the time, but to me I'm not sure if he knows when to light the fire when needed to.


Notice a reoccuring theme? He comes into a shitty team, makes them better, then they got worse (In the Knicks case, not even Jesus Christ himself could have turned that team around unless he went with a player-coach option). There's simply not enough time to have Larry come in and make the difference felt to salvage this season; let alone new offensive/defensive sets.

Yes, even at 20-30, the Bulls amazingly are only two games out of the 8th seed for the playoffs (Holy shit, we're talking worse then the NFC this past year). But even if they do manage to turn this around, do you really see this team doing anything it hasn't already done? They regressed, not progressed, and would get their asses whipped by Detroit, Orlando and obviously Boston. Brining on Larry now doesn't solve anything for this year.


Question: How many active coaches in the NBA are currently in the Hall of Fame? If you answered two, you are complete shit for brains (please bite a curb...on second thought, who really gives a shit about the NBA?? Curb is now optional) If you answered one, you are correct, sir. That would be the Zen Master. Brown didn't get there by fucking coincidence, the guy can coach. Yes, the Knicks were awful under his one year tenure, and he got outta there quicker then Heath Ledger did his pharmacist's office. However, he's gotta have a bad taste in his mouth about that, and I think the Bulls would be perfect for him to mold.

That's the main question you should be asking yourself. This season is officailly fucking worthless in my opinion. In my eyes, it just makes more sense to start over, trade Wallace in any way, shape or form, and start letting Brown go to work. This team is still good; it just needs an architect with the history of proven successes. Jim Boylan is not that man, Brown is. I think Boylan will be a good coach, but he's putting a band-aid on a broken leg at this point.

Johnny pop-a-shot has made some "Kenny Williamsesque" deals recently, and it's starting to bite him in the ass. While Williams likes to throw shit at the wall and see what sticks, Pax prefers to sit on pot and wait. Trade Deng and Gordon? No, he'll wait. Trade Wallace as quickly as fucking possible? Nope, his 1-7 shooting and 5 rebounds are really going to impress someone sooner then later. Paxson needs to convince not only Reinsdorf, but we the paying fans that something is going to change, and change for the better.

These are the thoughts I ponder. Wonder if Pax is thinking along these lines, too.

BallHype: hype it up!


Noce said...

While I'm not yet convinced on hiring Larry Brown either, who knows more about beating the Pistons than Brown? Granted the Bulls have actually done well against Detroit this year but it would definitely help to have him on the bench in a playoff series.

Anonymous said...

Agreed. Basketball isn't like football where you have a humongous playbook to install with a shitload of terminology. It's here some plays, go nuts. The more I think about it, the more I want him on the bench. It can't hurt at this point. Maybe he could get Gordon and Hinrich's puss asses to actually play.

World of Isaac said...

but what happens in a year when Larry decides Chicago isnt where he wants to be and starts looking for other jobs during halftime of a Bulls game?

IMO, LB is done....He might get you guys to a 500 record next year but in the long run, it will hurt the franchise more when you have to make yet another coaching change

just my .02....

good post by the way

stalkingerinandrews said...

Isn't Brown just a more expensive version of Skiles? He has the same kind of dictatorship coaching philosophy that players get tired of after a while. That's why I don't think this is a good idea. You will just alienate the players even more.

Anonymous said...

Yeah I get that vibe from him. But what's out there right now that's better then Brown? Rick Carlisle? No. Van Gundy? Fuck no. It's a watered down market, and to me, LB looks like the pick of a poor litter

Noce said...

We need a brotha to coach these brothas! Get Stacey King out of the broadcast booth and tell him to bring his telepromter with him and learn these Bulls how to fucking play like they did when King ran with Jordan and Pippen. Tell King to wear all his rings every game and there's no way the players wouldn't listen to him.

Anonymous said...

Yep. Nothing screams respect like career averages of 6.4 ppg and 3.3 rpg. At least Wallace would be able to say, Hey, looks like I'm on par for the course with coach this season!

Noce said...

To be a good coach doesn't mean you had to be a star player...just ask Phil Jackson (6.7 ppg, 4.3 rpg).

By the way I'd smack you for that Ben Wallace comment if I wasn't one cubicle over from you...wait a minute...

aa said...

As I write this post—longhandOffice 2010in a spiral notebook—I’m 20,000 feet above eastern Washington, having Microsoft Office 2010just crossed above the Cascades on my return flight Microsoft wordto Chicago. I visited Seattle for the weekend to Office 2007and I have known each other for 20 years now. They Microsoft Officehad a lovely ceremony, and the trip in general was fantastic.Microsoft Office 2007In the 13 years since I left Seattle, I’ve Office 2007 keyvisited six or seven times, and I always return to wherever has Office 2007 downloadOffice 2007 Professionalbecome home with mixed feelings about the place. It Outlook 2010both alarms and pleases me to see howMicrosoft outlookthat once-familiar areas seem almost foreign. ForMicrosoft outlook 2010neighborhoods have changed, to the point Windows 7 as have cookie-cutter, here-today-and-gone-tomorrow nightclubs that cater to the shiny shirt crowd.